Sunday, March 6, 2011

La Casa de Disaster

  Upon entering the Casa de Rodriguez, one will be greeted by one of four Jacksonian girls. All look no older than college age, and none appear to have even a hint of latino in them.

But la Casa offers authentic Mexican cuisine.

Looking from the walk-up cash register and kitchen area next to the door, a few potted plants separate the dining area from the empty, tiled “lobby.” Though snow covers the one row of cars found outside the two windows of la Casa’s dining room, one may be transported to summer  through the tasteless plastic red and white checkered table cloths covering each table. Mismatching chairs makes one wonder whether to turn and run.

Salsa music is barely heard over the roar of the kitchen, which makes little sense after seeing only one cook, thankfully, latino. Nothing, save the month-old restaurants under-construction website, screams “authentic.”  Maybe the Eduardo Fuss and Diego Rivera plastic framed pictures hanging strategically between windows.

The scene is that of older sloppy couples searching for a quick bite. With waitresses running from table to table, the nicest of which is in training, one senses the urgency of the typical American meal; cheap and fast. Here again, one should turn and run.

One may begin their meal with unlimited chips and salsa, but should not expect a refill. Maybe one will be asked again when the food has arrived and they are no longer necessary. The salsa choices are two, hot and mild, and resemble nothing more than a watery store bought can of  Pace or Chi Chi’s. Not horrible though, free as it is. The hot salsa holds quite a kick. It leaves the tongue tingly and begging for water, which reminds one that their water has still not been refilled.

If one is feeling adventurous, they may wish to try an appetizer. With few choices, and all sounding relatively safe, flautas may spike one’s interest, just remember to ask for them extra hot. Mexican egg rolls are also served and upon the arrival of the flautas, one may wonder if the chef has gotten them confused. Wrapped as one would imagine an egg roll would be, the four rolls are covered in a spicy salsa and overpowered with onions. Opting for a fork and knife, the fluffy fried layers fall apart when cut and the center is lukewarm at best.

Upon ordering entrees, do not expect to know what you will be eating. Other than a brief description on the menu, waitresses do not know the difference between a chimichanga and a wet burrito. The little knowledge may be paired directly with the unwillingness to learn. Maybe most customers don’t feel the need to ask, they just want to get in and out.

The dinner menu is vast and after some contemplation, orders may be made. Make sure you remember it’s name though, because you are bound to be asked again and again. “Sir, did you want chicken or beef in the chimichanga,” or “Miss, did you say hot or mild salsa?”

When as last one does order, the food will be out before you’ve closed the menu. Maybe for this credit is due. Many Americans are looking for a quick bite, and so this would satisfy most customers, older couples on date night not looking to spend much time with their partner.

Maybe due to the quickness of the food preparation, the entrees are also cold. Though a waitress would not know the answer, one can only imagine that the main ingredient, for the beef in particular, is salt. One can only withstand a few bites before trying desperately to slurp up what water is left beneath the ice. The salt does not allow for great food intake, and one leaves feeling full, but hungry an hour later. Don’t believe in la Casa’s authenticity, Americanized Chinese food dose the same darn thing!

If you opt for the chicken route, you are in for better luck. Though thin cuts, the blackened grilled chicken breast has great flavor. Similar to fajitas, but with a fancier name and housed under the “traditional Mexican dishes” menu, Carne a la Parilla lacked a skillet and common veggie fixings. Grilled onions served as a satisfactory side as well as refried beans and rice. 

The beef wet burrito and chimichanga tasted similar save a tortilla versus a fluffed and crunchy outer shell, respectively. A simple beef taco completed  the “choose your own three” entree. For one nostalgic of their college’s cafeteria, this meal would do just fine.

All in all, la Casa seems yet another Jackson trend. Once the few who actively and often take Wildwood Ave. have tried and been disappointed by the Mexican cuisine, it will be yet another failed small business endeavor. Non-strategically located, la Casa’s days are numbered.

11 comments:

  1. Stephanie, this critique is quite entertaining. I love that you interacted so much with the waitress(es) and were able to attest to her/their complete lack of knowledge. This added a great deal of humor to the piece, as did the sections describing the food, how it was served, and the bit at the end stating that "la Casa's days are numbered." Your audience in the piece was quite clear, another positive aspect of this review.

    It's pretty clear from the beginning what you thought of the place, but you made it funny and interesting throughout. I also like that you carefully pointed out the chicken and that it was a satisfactory option, rather than being completely negative and dismissing all possibility for success.

    In revision, I would definitely look back and replace the word 'one' with phrases such as 'the customers' or 'a diner.' You did a good job of avoiding the use of 'I' and referring to the reader as 'you,' but the use of 'one' gets highly repetitive. With that simple change I think this review could be even more solid, Stephanie. Great work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stephanie,
    Nice first draft! I really enjoyed your descriptions and felt like I was right there with you. I think your depiction of the waitresses is hilarious and real and you give nice reminders to their horrible customer service throughout the piece.
    I was a little confused, however, as to why you said La Casa was home to "authentic" mexican food, when later you challenge that notion by saying nothing "screamed authentic." Did a sign in the restaurant advertise it that way? Is that what it's reputation is throughout the town? If you decide to keep the word "authentic" in your piece, I'd clarify it a bit more for your readers. Either give your definition of it, or see if you can find out what the restaurant's definition is.
    Nice work!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great start Stephanie!
    Your "turn and run" theme in the beginning is great. Throughout the first few paragraphs we really get a great sense of voice and descriptive imagery that relay who the narrator is. The progression of the salsa and then the unfilled water was great, and your statements about the type of people who frequent this place is funny and informative. Great work!
    The ending ties the whole piece together nicely, again with great voice. One thing I would suggest changing would be the use of the word "one" throughout the piece; I had trouble with this and ended up just using "you" in reference to the diners, and to tighten it up a bit you could try using something like Gabriella suggested -- customer, diner, etc.
    This is so filled with voice and details! Great start, Stephanie!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stephanie

    I can just see you sitting in Jackson at this place, pissed about eating the restaurant equivalent of Caf food, and that's great. This piece was filled with beans, humor and Stephanie and that made it really fun to read.

    I agree with Gabriella that taking out the 'one' statements would be more direct and also make the piece easier to read. I was also confused about your mention of authentic when the restaurant seemed to be anything but. I think if you're going to go with sarcasm, you have to be really blatant about it, and it just didn't come through for me while I was reading it.

    I love how to took on some of Sifton's styles and took the one semi-decent element of the meal and then tore it down. It made it interesting, honest and comical at the same time.

    I would have liked to see a bit more showing than telling I here. I think some of this would be fixed when you get rid of the 'one' but also pushing the description would be really inviting and helpful as a reader.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with what others have said. I like the interjections that surprise the reader and show how silly some aspects of the restaurant are. Good voice as well. You also did a great job of describing the important parts of the various food items and making them stand out of the page. Great last line too.

    The "one"s are a bit overwhelming but I think that that's an easily fixed problem. I don't like the beginning of the last paragraph with "all in all." It seems too easy or obvious. I;m not sure what I'd use instead thought. I guess one option is to just cut it out.

    You do a great job writing to a Jackson audience. Great start!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stephanie,

    Nice pan!I always think they are more entertaining to read. I really liked how you revealed that despite the "authentic" Mexican food served La Casa, the restaurant is definitely catering to Americans short on time and taste. The food sounds just terrible--you do a great job of describing it to the reader in a really funny way! I also loved your description of the incompetent waiters.

    I really enjoy your voice, but think this piece could be even funnier if you cleared up a few confusing places and, as Gabrielle suggested, use a different word instead of "one." The "one does this, one does that..." kind of threw me and made me feel a little disconnected.

    A few spots that confused me...
    -In the paragraph where you talk about how "mismatching chairs makes one wonder whether to turn and run" I felt like this last sentence of the paragraph shifted from a summery, nice description to a more negative one.

    -Later, you say "nothing, save the month-old restaurants under-construction website, screams “authentic.” I'm not quite sure what this means.

    --You say that the appetizers sound "safe"--but to me Mexican egg rolls and flautas don't sound safe at all! Who do they sound safe to? How do they sound safe? Maybe you could list other appetizers so readers could understand what you mean by this. Also, later on you say "upon ordering entrees, do not expect to know what you will be eating"--this definitely does not sound safe.

    You have a great voice and great start. It was really fun to read!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This was really funny to read Stephanie, it sounds like the place was just awful! Bad food and bad service, but you managed to turn it into a very humorous story to read (since none of us will ever have to sit through it now).
    I like how choosing an appetizer makes a customer "adventurous." And as Nora said, I also like the reoccurring theme of wanting to turn and run.
    The whole atmosphere of the place seems uncomfortable, from the ruckus in the kitchen to the mismatched chairs at the tacky checkered tables. Your voice is very strong in this and the experience you had is clearly seen.
    People have already mentioned the over usage of "you" so don't really need to get into that.
    But yeah, great start!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I love your voice in this Steph!
    What does older ‘sloppy’ couples mean?
    Nice relations to the American meal
    Love the subtle humor! What is a flauta? There are a couple sentences where the voice is lost and it sounds too formal. You mention older couples a lot, what’s up with that? Are you writing this for the Jackson paper? Because I think that would really work!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought this piece was hilarious! You get the feeling through and through that this is a negative review, but in every paragraph it feels fair, because it starts off impartially like in "one could try an appetizer" and then, after experience it you judge it.

    I think the use of the "one" pronoun could be dosed off a little more. It's a smart choice not to go with I, but "one" being an uncommon pronoun it stands out a little too much

    ReplyDelete
  10. Your choice to go with "one" instead of "you" or something else was very interesting. i can't quite decide if i like it better or not then "you", but it did make the review seem a little less personal, not that that's bad. Anyway, your description of the food and service does a vivid job of outlining why this place won't be around much longer. I think the only thing that needs work is where you're going to place your But.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't know how relevant a suggestion this is, but maybe more grounding about Jackson and where Jackson is actually located, what kind of place it is (suburb, etc.)? Similarly--I wanted description of the restaurant to mash together with your food experience. I like that I finished reading with a very clear idea of what you felt about the place--that was important and harder to do in more of the mid-range reviews. I also think you do a commendable job letting your voice come through here. I was a little bit confused about your tone when you said that la Casa offers authentic Mexican cuisine-- maybe a qualifying "supposedly" or something? "According to.." ? I don't know! Good work so far, Stephanie!!

    ReplyDelete